Saturday, June 16, 2012

To capture a mood: psychiatric inpatient

Today is my second post in the "To capture a mood" series. In this series of posts I use my collages to illustrate mental states with the goal of increasing awareness of mental illness. See my March 6, 2012 post on mania for details on my "process."


In this entry  I hope to illustrate the experience of being a psychiatric inpatient.


I apologize if this is annoying, but I must begin with some disclaimers:
  • Not all experiences as a psychiatric inpatient are negative; Every person's experience is unique and this collage and accompanying discussion illustrates only one perspective. 
  • Oftentimes suffering leads to personal growth. Therefore, although the experiences described below may seem harmful, they may lead to improvement in symptoms and general well-being.
  • Inpatient treatment can be absolutely necessary to keep people safe and improve their quality of life.
Okay, here it is: "Treatment Compliance"


Treatment Compliance, 2012


To reiterate, this collage depicts the "scary" parts of inpatient treatment, not the positive ones. So as you read keep in mind you are hearing a biased account.


Like in my March post about mania, I will discuss different parts of the collage and why I chose specific images to evoke the mood I was attempting to capture.


Individuals with mental illness are hospitalized when they are deemed a risk to themselves or others. Suicidal and homicidal ideation are obvious examples. Hallucinations, delusions and extreme paranoia can also endanger the safety of the patient and others. Engaging in risky behaviors while manic (see March post for examples) can also justify institutionalization. Regardless of the reason for hospitalization, the experience of being confined is usually unpleasant. If you do not understand the reason(s) for your hospitalization (e.g. due to psychotic symptoms) it will be especially scary. However, even patients who agree that hospitalization is necessary, the feeling of confinement can still be traumatic. A hospital strives to be a place for healing, safety and growth, yet to the mentally ill it can feel like a prison.




Medication can be, and often is, lifesaving for individuals with serious mental illness. However, determining the correct type(s) and dosage(s) of medications can be a long and taxing process.


Hospitalization occurs during the acute stages of illness when symptoms are too severe to safely manage in an outpatient setting. Medication changes are often initiated immediately upon admission, the justification being that the current medication regime is not "doing its job" if the individual requires hospitalization.


The above left image represents the emptiness one may feel when faced with medication changes in the hospital. To me, her expression communicates "here we go again..." She appears resigned to the possibility that her feeling of "self" is likely to be affected by the medication adjustment.


The above right image represents the trust the patient is asked to place in his or her doctor(s). The blindfold symbolizes vulnerability; you often do not fully understand what you are being instructed to ingest, how it will affect your mood and sense of self, and what side effects you may experience. Yet you are expected to take the medication(s) offered without protest and any resistance may be documented as noncompliance.


Judgment is often passed on individuals diagnosed with mental illness who choose not to take medication as prescribed. This judgment, I believe, is the result of not understanding the diverse and far-ranging effects of these medications. Psychotropic drugs often have debilitating side-effects (to name a few: sedation, appetite changes with accompanying weight gain or loss, metabolic changes, tiredness, acquired motor disorders which may become permanent, hair loss, dry mouth, increased sweating, decreased libido, sexual dysfunction, gastrointestinal distress, decreased memory and/or concentration, insomnia, agitation, anxiety, the list goes on and on). Also, although drugs may relieve psychiatric symptoms, the "loss of self" some experience may outweigh the perceived benefit of drug (for the individual taking the drug, not an outsider). I will use the phrase "loss of self" often when discussing the treatment of mental illness. Though I am fiercely confident in my "gut-understanding" of the concept I struggle to articulate it. I welcome your comments as I truly want to describe the internal experience/thought-process that I have labeled "loss of self." For now I will move on to address other images in this collage. "Loss of self" will be discussed further as it relates to other images.

In the hospital you are always being watched. For good reason of course; it's extremely important that your safety and health is monitored and your progress (or lack thereof) is continually documented so as to inform future treatment decisions. Such scrutiny however is very disarming. The left images illustrate the unwanted exposure and privacy-violation one may feel being the subject of such ongoing observation.










In many ways, while hospitalized, you are treated as a child. You are nagged when you don't eat enough and chastised for substandard personal hygiene. You are not allowed to have sharp objects and your bedtime is strictly enforced. Again, such practices are for the benefit of patients. Keeping a regular schedule and knowing what to expect of one's environment helps with many forms of mental illness. The downside of such treatment may be that it can result in a self-fulfilling prophecy; being treated as a child leads one to behave as a child. If you are cognizant of this shift you may feel ashamed and discouraged. Regardless of one's self-awareness the regression to childlike behavior may result in a decrease in one's sense of personal responsibility for one's health and decreased ability to self-regulate following discharge.



On a psychiatric ward the television is one of your only entertainment options. Sadly, usually the programs being shown are not particularly enriching (but what would you expect of daytime programming?). However, for lack of other amusement, or simply to seek some form of distraction, many patients find themselves glued to the screen, regardless of whatever trashy reality show may be airing. Even if catatonia is not one of your presenting symptoms, your television exposure may cause you to look and/or feel catatonic!










The One-Way sign in the image to the right represents the lack of choices one has while hospitalized. Upon admission to the hospital you relinquish many of your rights, granting the institution legal permission to make decisions regarding your treatment. Again, the reason is to keep you safe; someone who is psychotic or suicidal is unlikely to make good decisions. However, feelings of powerlessness still arise. To me, the image of the man being swallowed by the fish is symbolic of the way one may feel after being admitted to a psychiatric unit; There's no going back, struggling will not make it better, and you are under the control of a more powerful entity.



In this last image I want to revisit the concept of "loss of self." To me, this image is a skeleton, devoid of substance. I'm not sure what type of structure it was, or was meant to be in the future. Simply put, it is empty of purpose.


Using the phrase "loss of self" is my attempt to communicate the process of feeling like you are losing sight of the "essence" of your personhood, which leads to feelings of emptiness. This process can occur for many reasons during mental health treatment.


First, sterile psychiatric wards have strict regulations regarding what you may wear and what possessions you make keep. Consequently, one route of expressing and remembering your identity is restricted.


Next, the side effects of psychiatric medications have far-ranging effects. Not every patient is aware of the multitude of ways medications affect their interaction with the world, but those who do gain insight may intensely grieve the loss of their former, pre-medicated self. Many medications used in inpatient settings have sedating effects (outpatient settings too, but more frequently in inpatient settings due to the higher severity of symptoms).You may feel "zombie-like," drained of energy and vitality. Combined with the impoverished hospital environment, apathy and/or depression often result. Medications can also affect the way you interact with others and your ability to engage in activities previously enjoyed (due to many of the side effects mentioned earlier).


Most saddening, in my opinion, is the personality changes one may observe or experience following the addition or change of a medication. For example, some report that their psychiatric medications sap their creativity, spontaneity and ambition.


I must comment that I believe medications are life-saving in many situations, but I also feel that it is important to report the full story. That is, medications can do much good, but they have a dark side as well.


To summarize, the elements of the psychiatric inpatient experience I wished to illustrate in my collage and in this discussion are: confinement, medication, scrutiny, infantile treatment, impoverished environment, powerlessness, emptiness, and the feeling of "losing oneself."


A few final words:
Sorry if I get preachy . . .
  • Spread awareness about mental illness- we need to stop shaming and hiding those who suffer!
  • Empathy- if you make an effort to consider a new perspective you may touch lives in a positive way without even knowing it!
  • Healthcare trends- What historically used techniques and practices are still valid today? What new approaches can we take? How can we continue to evolve as healthcare providers?
  • Recommended reading: "Girl Interrupted" by Susanna Kaysen. The movie is great but the book is AMAZING. 
Confession: These posts about mental illness are very difficult for me to write. Sharing my collages makes me feel vulnerable and the subject matter makes me depressed. But I am passionate about helping the mentally ill and I hope my little blog can spread awareness, even if I only have 3 readers :)


Thank you so much for reading and, as always, I welcome your stories, comments and questions.

9 comments:

  1. Here's another reading recommendation from my friend and mentor, a practicing clinical psychologist: "Asylums" by Erving Goffman
    I haven't read it but it's going on my list now!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Extremely interesting. The discussion of 'loss of self' is paticularly captivating. I wonder if patients often experience confusion over self as well, finding it difficult to determine one's 'true self.' It must be hard to determine if who you're meant to is your personaility with or without the effects of meds. For example, like you mentioned, stability can be gained but creativity can be lost.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow- another enlightening piece. You write so clearly and concisely about such complicated issues, it is eye-opening. You bring up many complex issues, and I agree that "sense of self" is the term so often used, but so lacking in really conveying the message that it seems a minor problem-- but in reality is a hugely important factor in everyone's self confidence, happiness and sense of purpose in the world. Good point Michelle that in addition to medication, it is often difficult for both the mentally ill, and mentally healthy, to determine... in fact, I would say that the 'happiest' people are those that never address this issue at all- the brainwashed that own their house in suburbia, their 2.5 kids, their SUV, ever pumped full of society's consumer messages and constant meaningless chatter that they never have a free moment to think for themselves, what do I really want? what IS life about? who am I??? It is not only the mental inpatients that are catatonic from watching too much TV- it is a large portion of the US population. I ask, is that happiness? Being self-UNaware? Going through the motions that papertowel commercials tell you is happiness, and believing it is so because you have 2 kids and diligently clean up their messes with disposable napkins? I say perhaps, and perhaps the whole notion of happiness in this country is a scheme cooked up by advertising agencies-- like Valentine's Day. It seems the American public has chosen to be told who they are, rather than put forth the mental and emotional effort of determining the truth because our society truely discourages this effort. Being self aware inherently creates conflict with society's ever-present messages of emptiness and superficiality. To be self-aware and true to one's self, must you become an outcast of our modern American society? I suggest moving to Europe.

    Sorry, this appears to have gone far off on a tangent, but thank you for prompting this exploration. I guess in the end what I am saying is that I respect the struggle with sense of self, and the effort put forth to find this self. I feel that more people should be forced to wrestle with this issue- and hope that in the end it will bring them more fulfillment and happiness than they would have had without it (as you say in the beginning regarding struggle leading to personal growth and improvement). In the case of the mentally ill this should be regarded as a serious issue and I hope the medical community should make an effort to foster this process, or at least recognize the traumatic experience it creates to lose this sense. I also wonder if the alarmingly high rates of depression in today's society are a symptom of our minds feeling conflict with/rejecting the messages being pumped into them. Whether conscious or not, it seems our brains may ultimately know what is best for us, and the world we have created is not. It is sad that this epidemic is treated with medications and attempts to get individuals to conform to society's constraints, instead of taking a hard look at our society and making it more conducive to the human spirit. I suppose this is why I live in San Francisco.

    ReplyDelete
  4. p.s. I'm glad i have no one to chastise me about inadequate personal hygeine! that would be a disaster!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is really a great topic. Having grown up in the stultifying 50's -60's feeling like the dog in Kurt Vonnegut's short story, which, living in a NYC apt and having to concentrate on the most important thing in his life was not to shit on the floor, concluded that he had been born onto the wrong planet. Then along came authors like Vonnegut, and books like Demian and Steppenwolf, and 1984 and Brave New World and Catch 22. The last three expressed an amplified metaphor of the mechanisms of society/government/business that make free minds feel as if they are abnormal, and the preceding ones showed how free minds react and evade those pressures. And this whole tension in the 60's exploded with the hippy revolution, which was about a lot more than sex, drugs and rock and roll, though I must admit those were heady benefits, and no wonder; natural hedonism is a release from the trammels.
    But, the pressures of conformity are not conspired or planned necessarily (though adverts certainly are, but not to numb us, to make us spend in certain directions). The techno-purcho-babbo sea in which we swim is self-evolving based on what works. Some great writer from the French Enlightment wrote hundreds of years ago that "man has built himself a golden cage, and now he rattles the bars helplessly from within". This blog and topic shows that we humans are also building golden keys that lead us to new levels of freedom, thought and flights of fancy. Rave on, species!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Love the golden cage and keys analogy- very apt. I did not mean to imply that certain individuals contrived this cage of society for the rest of us- it is just easier to describe by writing it that way. It is true that it just evolves all on its own. However, what evolves because of 'what works' I think is not so accurate- it evolves because it happens, and what 'works' for a select few may drive these process that are not in the best interests or beneficial for others, or even the majority, or mankind in general. This is why governments make laws against certain actions- to protect the general populace against eachother/themselves. Unfortunately, there is no organization to analyze and make such policies to protect our social health and mental wellbeing against spontaneously evolving 'happenings' that become detrimental to the individual and society as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Michelle (and everyone else too!)- Personality is a word difficult to define but definitely part of one's concept of "self." We all struggle with finding our "true self" (I like the term, who cares if it sounds cliche!) but I believe it is especially difficult for those diagnosed with mental illness, diseases which affect the mind (and defining "mind" is a challenge too!). One thing I've noticed is that people may incorporate their diagnoses into their personal construct of self. They may think "I AM a schizophrenic" rather than "I am a PERSON diagnosed with the illness of schizophrenia." This is also seen in victims of other illnesses; cancer patients may begin to identify primarily as a cancer patient (and we cannot blame them, it consumes their lives) and they consequently lose sight of their underlying self. Of course illnesses, of any sort, alter the self, as struggles and new experiences instigate change. The challenge, in my opinion, is helping others to find their "true self" and determining how illness AFFECTS sense of self rather than DETERMINES the self and therefore what is possible for one to become.

    @sweiman and Carl- Wow. I am so surprised and THRILLED that the concept ,“loss of self,” which I found so difficult to articulate has started such a wonderful and thought-provoking conversation. Thank you for carrying the discussion beyond the mental-health-treatment arena. I believe one of the reasons individuals with mental illnesses are so stigmatized and demoralized is because they are categorized as “other” and “abnormal.” Your comments illustrate that we all, ill or not, struggle with the same existential questions! Society is constantly asking us to define and explain. Then, many are unhappy or concerned if our responses do not fit into one of the categories they have been taught. However, I think we must remember that categorization is a natural human tendency; if we did not group things into categories we would have a very difficult time learning about and therefore interacting with the world. My goal is to resist defining myself and explaining my choices to others. It is my right to remain a mystery! I also believe this is the more difficult path. It’s much easier, as you suggest, to allow your culture to define you and then enjoy the resulting societal acceptance. Yet you also suggest that the existential struggle “pays off” in the end. Let’s hope so!

    I think I'm done rambling for now. Thank you all for reading and thank you for your comments! I am truly loving this discussion and am honored that you are taking the time to respond to my writing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. turns out someone has made a movie about this already! Really interesting... http://www.hulu.com/watch/178899#s-p1-sundefined-i0

    ReplyDelete